Combat Edge Intelligence

Branden Lee Hinkle vs Zac Pauga

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Zac Pauga
us

Zac Pauga

“The Ripper”

7-4-0Light HeavyweightXFC

1571Solid

Tale of the tape

17-11-0Record7-4-0
HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'2"Height6'0"
TBDReach76"
230 lbsWeight205 lbs
Hammer HouseTeamElevation Fight Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Branden Lee HinkleNow 1569
If they win+16→ 1585
If they lose-16→ 1553
Zac PaugaNow 1571
If they win+16→ 1587
If they lose-16→ 1555

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1586 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1575 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.61
Sig. strikes / min
4.46
69%
Strike accuracy
63%
3.91
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.73
26%
Strike defense
59%
4.34
Takedown avg.
0.38
57%
Takedown accuracy
8%
67%
Takedown defense
100%
4.34
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Branden Lee HinkleZac Pauga
1550160020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

12 (71%)
KO/TKO
1 (14%)
3 (18%)
Submission
1 (14%)
2 (12%)
Decision
5 (71%)

Combat Edge model read

Zac Pauga52%
Branden Lee Hinkle 48%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Zac Pauga a 52% favorite over Branden Lee Hinkle in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1569 vs 1571), separated by just 2 points.

Branden Lee Hinkle finishes 88% of wins inside the distance, Zac Pauga 29%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.