Combat Edge Intelligence

David Allen vs Jeremiah Riggs

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

2-2-0Record7-8-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'0"Height6'0"
-ReachTBD
185 lbsWeight181 lbs
Roker Rough House MMATeamSports Lab

What's at stake

Jeremiah Riggs is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — David Allen carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

David AllenNow 1469
If they win+25→ 1494
If they lose-23→ 1446
Jeremiah RiggsNow 1489
If they win+15→ 1504
If they lose-17→ 1472

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1500 · 3 fightsPre-fight Elo1516 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

David AllenJeremiah Riggs
1450150015502011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (100%)
KO/TKO
1 (14%)
0 (0%)
Submission
3 (43%)
0 (0%)
Decision
3 (43%)

Combat Edge model read

David Allen83%
Jeremiah Riggs 17%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes David Allen a 83% favorite over Jeremiah Riggs in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Jeremiah Riggs's way (47%).

Jeremiah Riggs holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1489 to 1469, a 20-point edge.

David Allen enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Jeremiah Riggs enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jeremiah Riggs 57%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.