Combat Edge Intelligence

Dean Garnett vs Ken Stone

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

15-4-1Record11-4-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'6"Height5'8"
64"ReachTBD
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Team McHaleTeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Dean GarnettNow 1627
If they win+16→ 1643
If they lose-16→ 1611
Ken StoneNow 1629
If they win+16→ 1645
If they lose-16→ 1613

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1557 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1544 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
3.85
TBD
Strike accuracy
49%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.90
TBD
Strike defense
49%
TBD
Takedown avg.
1.24
TBD
Takedown accuracy
33%
TBD
Takedown defense
60%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.62

Trajectory

Dean GarnettKen Stone
160016502011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (27%)
KO/TKO
4 (36%)
6 (40%)
Submission
6 (55%)
5 (33%)
Decision
1 (9%)

Combat Edge model read

Dean Garnett66%
Ken Stone 34%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Dean Garnett a 66% favorite over Ken Stone in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Ken Stone's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1627 vs 1629), separated by just 2 points.

Dean Garnett finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Ken Stone 91%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.