Combat Edge Intelligence

Denis Goltsov vs Jailton Almeida

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Denis Goltsov
ru

Denis Goltsov

“The Russian Bogatyr”

35-8-0HeavyweightPFL

1765Great

Tale of the tape

35-8-0Record22-5-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'5"Height6'4"
78.00"Reach79"
248 lbsWeight241 lbs
Sambo PiterTeamGalpao da Luta

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Denis GoltsovNow 1765
If they win+12→ 1777
If they lose-12→ 1753
Jailton AlmeidaNow 1771
If they win+16→ 1787
If they lose-16→ 1755

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1626 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1717 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
2.25
TBD
Strike accuracy
66%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
1.02
TBD
Strike defense
36%
TBD
Takedown avg.
6.66
TBD
Takedown accuracy
63%
TBD
Takedown defense
60%
TBD
Submission avg.
1.98

Trajectory

Denis GoltsovJailton Almeida
17501800202420252026

Win method breakdown

18 (51%)
KO/TKO
8 (36%)
11 (31%)
Submission
13 (59%)
6 (17%)
Decision
1 (5%)

Combat Edge model read

Jailton Almeida60%
Denis Goltsov 40%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Jailton Almeida a 60% favorite over Denis Goltsov in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1765 vs 1771), separated by just 6 points.

Jailton Almeida enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Denis Goltsov finishes 83% of wins inside the distance, Jailton Almeida 95%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.