Combat Edge Intelligence

Emily Whitmire vs Jade Masson-Wong

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

4-5-0Record3-3-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'5"Height5'4"
TBDReach63"
125 lbsWeight125 lbs
Syndicate MMATeamNova Gym Centre Fitness MMA

What's at stake

Jade Masson-Wong is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +22 while a loss costs more — Emily Whitmire carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Emily WhitmireNow 1476
If they win+26→ 1502
If they lose-22→ 1454
Jade Masson-WongNow 1498
If they win+22→ 1520
If they lose-26→ 1472

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1533 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1532 · 6 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.50
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
31%
Strike accuracy
TBD
2.98
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
54%
Strike defense
TBD
1.90
Takedown avg.
TBD
67%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
70%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.48
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Emily WhitmireJade Masson-Wong
150015502020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
1 (33%)
1 (25%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (75%)
Decision
2 (67%)

Combat Edge model read

Jade Masson-Wong68%
Emily Whitmire 32%Elo baseline: 53%

The Combat Edge model makes Jade Masson-Wong a 68% favorite over Emily Whitmire in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (53%).

Jade Masson-Wong holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1498 to 1476, a 22-point edge.

Emily Whitmire enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jade Masson-Wong enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Emily Whitmire finishes 25% of wins inside the distance, Jade Masson-Wong 33%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.