Combat Edge Intelligence

Eoghan Masoliver vs John Hosman

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

2-0-0Record18-8-1
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'9"Height5'10"
67"ReachTBD
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Fight Academy IrelandTeamMidwest Training Center

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Eoghan MasoliverNow 1558
If they win+24→ 1582
If they lose-24→ 1534
John HosmanNow 1564
If they win+16→ 1580
If they lose-16→ 1548

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1515 · 2 fightsPre-fight Elo1528 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
1.11
TBD
Strike accuracy
38%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
1.52
TBD
Strike defense
46%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
46%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Eoghan MasoliverJohn Hosman
15501600200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (50%)
KO/TKO
7 (39%)
1 (50%)
Submission
9 (50%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (11%)

Combat Edge model read

Eoghan Masoliver70%
John Hosman 30%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Eoghan Masoliver a 70% favorite over John Hosman in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans John Hosman's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1558 vs 1564), separated by just 6 points.

Eoghan Masoliver enters on a 2-fight win streak.

John Hosman enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

John Hosman 89%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.