Combat Edge Intelligence

Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem vs Joshua Onwordi

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

6-3-0Record7-7-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'9"
-Reach-
170 lbsWeight171 lbs
TBDTeamBKK Fighters

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Eslam Mostafa Abdel MenemNow 1505
If they win+24→ 1529
If they lose-24→ 1481
Joshua OnwordiNow 1502
If they win+16→ 1518
If they lose-16→ 1486

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1498 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1506 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Eslam Mostafa Abdel MenemJoshua Onwordi
145015001550202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (17%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
2 (33%)
Submission
2 (29%)
3 (50%)
Decision
5 (71%)

Combat Edge model read

Joshua Onwordi63%
Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Joshua Onwordi a 63% favorite over Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1505 vs 1502), separated by just 3 points.

Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Eslam Mostafa Abdel Menem finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Joshua Onwordi 29%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.