Combat Edge Intelligence

Gable Steveson vs Mukhamad Vakhaev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

4-0-0Record13-9-1
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'1"Height6'0"
74"Reach-
265 lbsWeight266 lbs
La Bodega Fight ClubTeamFight Club Akhmat

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Gable StevesonNow 1605
If they win+24→ 1629
If they lose-24→ 1581
Mukhamad VakhaevNow 1609
If they win+16→ 1625
If they lose-16→ 1593

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1510 · 4 fightsPre-fight Elo1626 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Gable StevesonMukhamad Vakhaev
155016001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (100%)
KO/TKO
6 (46%)
0 (0%)
Submission
5 (38%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (15%)

Combat Edge model read

Gable Steveson76%
Mukhamad Vakhaev 24%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Gable Steveson a 76% favorite over Mukhamad Vakhaev in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Mukhamad Vakhaev's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1605 vs 1609), separated by just 4 points.

Gable Steveson enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Mukhamad Vakhaev enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Gable Steveson finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Mukhamad Vakhaev 85%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.