Combat Edge Intelligence

Gvido Šusts vs Tim Lajcik

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tim Lajcik
us

Tim Lajcik

“The Bohemian”

7-6-1Heavyweight

1509Average

Tale of the tape

2-1-0Record7-6-1
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
TBDHeight6'1"
-ReachTBD
265 lbsWeight225 lbs
TBDTeamGladiators Training Academy

What's at stake

Gvido Šusts is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +22 while a loss costs more — Tim Lajcik carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Gvido ŠustsNow 1531
If they win+22→ 1553
If they lose-26→ 1505
Tim LajcikNow 1509
If they win+17→ 1526
If they lose-15→ 1494

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1518 · 3 fightsPre-fight Elo1535 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Gvido ŠustsTim Lajcik
15001550200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (100%)
KO/TKO
5 (71%)
0 (0%)
Submission
1 (14%)
0 (0%)
Decision
1 (14%)

Combat Edge model read

Gvido Šusts61%
Tim Lajcik 39%Elo baseline: 53%

The Combat Edge model makes Gvido Šusts a 61% favorite over Tim Lajcik in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (53%).

Gvido Šusts holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1531 to 1509, a 22-point edge.

Tim Lajcik enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Tim Lajcik 86%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.