Combat Edge Intelligence

Hussein Fakher vs Kenny Giddens

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

7-4-0Record12-7-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height5'11"
-ReachTBD
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Dragon TeamTeamTBD

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Hussein FakherNow 1562
If they win+16→ 1578
If they lose-16→ 1546
Kenny GiddensNow 1556
If they win+16→ 1572
If they lose-16→ 1540

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1496 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1516 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Hussein FakherKenny Giddens
1500155020092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

1 (14%)
KO/TKO
4 (36%)
4 (57%)
Submission
7 (64%)
2 (29%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Hussein Fakher52%
Kenny Giddens 48%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Hussein Fakher a 52% favorite over Kenny Giddens in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1562 vs 1556), separated by just 6 points.

Hussein Fakher enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Kenny Giddens enters on a 3-fight win streak.

Hussein Fakher finishes 71% of wins inside the distance, Kenny Giddens 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.