Combat Edge Intelligence

Imamshafi Aliev vs Mark Munoz

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Mark Munoz
us

Mark Munoz

“The Filipino Wrecking Machine”

14-6-0MiddleweightUFC

1639Solid

Tale of the tape

10-2-0Record14-6-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'0"Height6'0"
72.5"ReachTBD
185 lbsWeight185 lbs
American Kickboxing AcademyTeamReign MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Imamshafi AlievNow 1640
If they win+16→ 1656
If they lose-16→ 1624
Mark MunozNow 1639
If they win+16→ 1655
If they lose-16→ 1623

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1506 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1682 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
3.12
TBD
Strike accuracy
51%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.26
TBD
Strike defense
57%
TBD
Takedown avg.
3.17
TBD
Takedown accuracy
30%
TBD
Takedown defense
58%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.55

Trajectory

Imamshafi AlievMark Munoz
165017002013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

4 (40%)
KO/TKO
7 (50%)
2 (20%)
Submission
0 (0%)
4 (40%)
Decision
7 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Imamshafi Aliev64%
Mark Munoz 36%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Imamshafi Aliev a 64% favorite over Mark Munoz in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1640 vs 1639), separated by just 1 points.

Imamshafi Aliev finishes 60% of wins inside the distance, Mark Munoz 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.