Combat Edge Intelligence

Impa Kasanganay vs Nicolas Dalby

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Nicolas Dalby
dk

Nicolas Dalby

“Danish Dynamite”

24-6-1WelterweightUFC

1729Good

Tale of the tape

20-6-0Record24-6-1
Light HeavyweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'11"
75"Reach74"
205 lbsWeight171 lbs
Kill Cliff FCTeamRumble Sports

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Impa KasanganayNow 1731
If they win+12→ 1743
If they lose-12→ 1719
Nicolas DalbyNow 1729
If they win+12→ 1741
If they lose-12→ 1717

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1649 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1727 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
3.88
TBD
Strike accuracy
44%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.51
TBD
Strike defense
52%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0.90
TBD
Takedown accuracy
27%
TBD
Takedown defense
59%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.08

Trajectory

Impa KasanganayNicolas Dalby
17001750202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (40%)
KO/TKO
7 (29%)
3 (15%)
Submission
4 (17%)
9 (45%)
Decision
13 (54%)

Combat Edge model read

Impa Kasanganay64%
Nicolas Dalby 36%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Impa Kasanganay a 64% favorite over Nicolas Dalby in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1731 vs 1729), separated by just 2 points.

Impa Kasanganay enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Impa Kasanganay finishes 55% of wins inside the distance, Nicolas Dalby 46%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.