Combat Edge Intelligence

Israel Delgado vs John Polakowski

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

4-3-0Record2-2-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height5'9"
UnknownReachTBD
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Panther Muay ThaiTeamThe Pit

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Israel DelgadoNow 1463
If they win+25→ 1488
If they lose-23→ 1440
John PolakowskiNow 1476
If they win+23→ 1499
If they lose-25→ 1451

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1573 · 2 fightsPre-fight Elo1525 · 5 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
0.14
TBD
Strike accuracy
4%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.05
TBD
Strike defense
44%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
75%
TBD
Submission avg.
2.05

Trajectory

Israel DelgadoJohn Polakowski
145015001550200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

2 (50%)
KO/TKO
1 (50%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
2 (50%)
Decision
1 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

John Polakowski58%
Israel Delgado 42%Elo baseline: 52%

The Combat Edge model makes John Polakowski a 58% favorite over Israel Delgado in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (52%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1463 vs 1476), separated by just 13 points.

Israel Delgado enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

John Polakowski enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Israel Delgado finishes 50% of wins inside the distance.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.