Combat Edge Intelligence

Jake O'Brien vs Uran Satybaldiev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

15-4-0Record9-1-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'3"Height6'4"
TBDReach79"
205 lbsWeight205 lbs
Integrated Fighting AcademyTeamUluu Kyrgyz Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jake O'BrienNow 1692
If they win+16→ 1708
If they lose-16→ 1676
Uran SatybaldievNow 1686
If they win+16→ 1702
If they lose-16→ 1670

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1588 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1545 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.32
Sig. strikes / min
2.14
32%
Strike accuracy
25%
1.93
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.66
69%
Strike defense
45%
6.44
Takedown avg.
0
57%
Takedown accuracy
0%
25%
Takedown defense
50%
0.21
Submission avg.
1.69

Trajectory

Jake O'BrienUran Satybaldiev
16501700201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

7 (47%)
KO/TKO
5 (56%)
3 (20%)
Submission
2 (22%)
5 (33%)
Decision
2 (22%)

Combat Edge model read

Uran Satybaldiev64%
Jake O'Brien 36%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Uran Satybaldiev a 64% favorite over Jake O'Brien in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Jake O'Brien's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1692 vs 1686), separated by just 6 points.

Jake O'Brien enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Jake O'Brien finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Uran Satybaldiev 78%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.