Combat Edge Intelligence

James Toney vs Matheus Scheffel

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
James Toney
us

James Toney

“Lights Out”

0-1-0HeavyweightUFC

1488Average

Tale of the tape

0-1-0Record17-11-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
5'10"Height6'2"
TBDReachTBD
237 lbsWeight262 lbs
M-1 Global Training CenterTeamCM System

What's at stake

Matheus Scheffel is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +11 while a loss costs more — James Toney carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

James ToneyNow 1488
If they win+26→ 1514
If they lose-22→ 1466
Matheus ScheffelNow 1521
If they win+11→ 1532
If they lose-13→ 1508

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1735 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1611 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0
Sig. strikes / min
1.33
TBD
Strike accuracy
36%
2.41
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3
27%
Strike defense
47%
0
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
0%
Takedown defense
100%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

James ToneyMatheus Scheffel
150015501600201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
12 (71%)
0 (0%)
Submission
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Decision
5 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Matheus Scheffel58%
James Toney 42%Elo baseline: 55%

The Combat Edge model makes Matheus Scheffel a 58% favorite over James Toney in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (55%).

Matheus Scheffel holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1521 to 1488, a 33-point edge.

Matheus Scheffel enters on a 5-fight loss streak.

Matheus Scheffel 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.