Combat Edge Intelligence

Joe Moreira vs Matthew O'Rourke

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Joe Moreira
br

Joe Moreira

“Macaco”

2-2-0Light Heavyweight

1494Average

Tale of the tape

2-2-0Record0-1-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
5'11"Height-
TBDReach-
205 lbsWeight205 lbs
TBDTeamTeam Ryano Waterford

What's at stake

Joe Moreira is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +22 while a loss costs more — Matthew O'Rourke carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Joe MoreiraNow 1494
If they win+22→ 1516
If they lose-26→ 1468
Matthew O'RourkeNow 1471
If they win+26→ 1497
If they lose-22→ 1449

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1478 · 4 fightsPre-fight Elo1503 · 1 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Joe MoreiraMatthew O'Rourke
1500200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
1 (50%)
Submission
0 (0%)
1 (50%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Matthew O'Rourke57%
Joe Moreira 43%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes Matthew O'Rourke a 57% favorite over Joe Moreira in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Joe Moreira's way (47%).

Joe Moreira holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1494 to 1471, a 23-point edge.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.