Combat Edge Intelligence

Jordan Williams vs Tamerlan Temirov

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

9-6-0Record4-1-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'8"
75"Reach72"
170 lbsWeight158 lbs
Nor-Cal Fighting AllianceTeamDr. Makoi Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jordan WilliamsNow 1572
If they win+16→ 1588
If they lose-16→ 1556
Tamerlan TemirovNow 1573
If they win+24→ 1597
If they lose-24→ 1549

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1589 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1513 · 9 fights

Tracked stat edges

5.83
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
50%
Strike accuracy
TBD
5.46
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
36%
Strike defense
TBD
1.11
Takedown avg.
TBD
50%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
85%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jordan WilliamsTamerlan Temirov
155016002020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (78%)
KO/TKO
1 (25%)
1 (11%)
Submission
0 (0%)
1 (11%)
Decision
3 (75%)

Combat Edge model read

Tamerlan Temirov70%
Jordan Williams 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Tamerlan Temirov a 70% favorite over Jordan Williams in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1572 vs 1573), separated by just 1 points.

Jordan Williams enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Jordan Williams finishes 89% of wins inside the distance, Tamerlan Temirov 25%.

Jordan Williams carries a 3-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.