Combat Edge Intelligence

Josh Bryant vs Scott Askham

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Josh Bryant
us

Josh Bryant

“The Beast”

15-4-0MiddleweightTFC

1675Good

Tale of the tape

15-4-0Record20-6-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
6'0"Height6'3"
TBDReach75,0"
185 lbsWeight185 lbs
Absolute Combat AllianceTeamAmerican Top Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Josh BryantNow 1675
If they win+16→ 1691
If they lose-16→ 1659
Scott AskhamNow 1676
If they win+12→ 1688
If they lose-12→ 1664

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1549 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1623 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.10
Sig. strikes / min
3.03
20%
Strike accuracy
46%
6.10
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.52
43%
Strike defense
52%
0
Takedown avg.
0.44
0%
Takedown accuracy
18%
0%
Takedown defense
65%
0
Submission avg.
0.67

Trajectory

Josh BryantScott Askham
165017002012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

4 (27%)
KO/TKO
12 (60%)
6 (40%)
Submission
2 (10%)
5 (33%)
Decision
6 (30%)

Combat Edge model read

Josh Bryant52%
Scott Askham 48%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Josh Bryant a 52% favorite over Scott Askham in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Scott Askham's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1675 vs 1676), separated by just 1 points.

Josh Bryant finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Scott Askham 70%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.