Combat Edge Intelligence

Joshua Onwordi vs Tim Stout

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tim Stout
us

Tim Stout

“Moab”

12-10-0WelterweightECSC

1496Average

Tale of the tape

7-7-0Record12-10-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'9"Height5'11"
-ReachTBD
171 lbsWeight170 lbs
BKK FightersTeamTeam Oxendine

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Joshua OnwordiNow 1502
If they win+16→ 1518
If they lose-16→ 1486
Tim StoutNow 1496
If they win+16→ 1512
If they lose-16→ 1480

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1506 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1507 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Joshua OnwordiTim Stout
145015001550200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
8 (67%)
2 (29%)
Submission
3 (25%)
5 (71%)
Decision
1 (8%)

Combat Edge model read

Joshua Onwordi76%
Tim Stout 24%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Joshua Onwordi a 76% favorite over Tim Stout in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1502 vs 1496), separated by just 6 points.

Tim Stout enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Joshua Onwordi finishes 29% of wins inside the distance, Tim Stout 92%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.