Combat Edge Intelligence

Kenneth Seegrist vs Leonardo Guimaraes

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

5-7-0Record15-14-1
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'0"Height6'0"
TBDReach73"
189 lbsWeight205 lbs
TBDTeamTata Fight Team

What's at stake

Kenneth Seegrist is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Leonardo Guimaraes carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Kenneth SeegristNow 1459
If they win+15→ 1474
If they lose-17→ 1442
Leonardo GuimaraesNow 1432
If they win+17→ 1449
If they lose-15→ 1417

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1501 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1523 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Kenneth SeegristLeonardo Guimaraes
14001450202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

3 (60%)
KO/TKO
4 (27%)
2 (40%)
Submission
8 (53%)
0 (0%)
Decision
3 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Leonardo Guimaraes51%
Kenneth Seegrist 49%Elo baseline: 46%

The Combat Edge model makes Leonardo Guimaraes a 51% favorite over Kenneth Seegrist in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Kenneth Seegrist's way (46%).

Kenneth Seegrist holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1459 to 1432, a 27-point edge.

Kenneth Seegrist finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Leonardo Guimaraes 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.