Combat Edge Intelligence

Kyle Noke vs Peter Sobotta

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Kyle Noke
au

Kyle Noke

“KO”

22-10-1WelterweightUFC

1640Solid

Tale of the tape

22-10-1Record17-7-1
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'1"Height6'0"
76,0"ReachTBD
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Jackson-Wink MMATeamPlanet Eater

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Kyle NokeNow 1640
If they win+12→ 1652
If they lose-12→ 1628
Peter SobottaNow 1652
If they win+12→ 1664
If they lose-12→ 1640

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1661 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1613 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.23
Sig. strikes / min
2.14
51%
Strike accuracy
40%
2.09
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.90
64%
Strike defense
59%
1.53
Takedown avg.
1.53
55%
Takedown accuracy
32%
67%
Takedown defense
78%
0.76
Submission avg.
0.51

Trajectory

Kyle NokePeter Sobotta
1650201520162017201820192020

Win method breakdown

9 (41%)
KO/TKO
5 (29%)
7 (32%)
Submission
10 (59%)
6 (27%)
Decision
2 (12%)

Combat Edge model read

Peter Sobotta63%
Kyle Noke 37%Elo baseline: 52%

The Combat Edge model makes Peter Sobotta a 63% favorite over Kyle Noke in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (52%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1640 vs 1652), separated by just 12 points.

Kyle Noke enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Peter Sobotta enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Kyle Noke finishes 73% of wins inside the distance, Peter Sobotta 88%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.