Combat Edge Intelligence

Leonardo Silva vs Tom Lawlor

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tom Lawlor
us

Tom Lawlor

“Filthy”

11-8-0Light HeavyweightPFL

1583Solid

Tale of the tape

22-10-0Record11-8-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'2"Height6'0"
75"Reach74,0"
206 lbsWeight205 lbs
China TeamTeamThe Jungle MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Leonardo SilvaNow 1588
If they win+12→ 1600
If they lose-12→ 1576
Tom LawlorNow 1583
If they win+16→ 1599
If they lose-16→ 1567

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1514 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1636 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.07
Sig. strikes / min
2.50
40%
Strike accuracy
42%
0.54
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.41
50%
Strike defense
61%
24.11
Takedown avg.
2.46
50%
Takedown accuracy
32%
0%
Takedown defense
58%
0
Submission avg.
1.38

Trajectory

Leonardo SilvaTom Lawlor
15501600165020192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

12 (55%)
KO/TKO
4 (36%)
4 (18%)
Submission
4 (36%)
6 (27%)
Decision
3 (27%)

Combat Edge model read

Leonardo Silva66%
Tom Lawlor 34%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Leonardo Silva a 66% favorite over Tom Lawlor in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1588 vs 1583), separated by just 5 points.

Leonardo Silva enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Leonardo Silva finishes 73% of wins inside the distance, Tom Lawlor 73%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.