Combat Edge Intelligence

Luis Pena vs Mandel Nallo

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Luis Pena
us

Luis Pena

“Violent Bob Ross”

12-6-0WelterweightAFS

1634Solid
Mandel Nallo
ca

Mandel Nallo

“Rat Garbage / Mango”

14-4-0LightweightUFC

1635Solid

Tale of the tape

12-6-0Record14-4-0
WelterweightDivisionLightweight
6'3"Height6'0"
TBDReach75"
161 lbsWeight155 lbs
American Top Team SunriseTeamTristar Gym

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Luis PenaNow 1634
If they win+16→ 1650
If they lose-16→ 1618
Mandel NalloNow 1635
If they win+16→ 1651
If they lose-16→ 1619

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1564 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1524 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.66
Sig. strikes / min
8.61
47%
Strike accuracy
63%
3.12
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.58
51%
Strike defense
73%
1.17
Takedown avg.
0
33%
Takedown accuracy
0%
48%
Takedown defense
100%
1.17
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Luis PenaMandel Nallo
16001650170020222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

3 (25%)
KO/TKO
8 (57%)
5 (42%)
Submission
6 (43%)
4 (33%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Mandel Nallo60%
Luis Pena 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Mandel Nallo a 60% favorite over Luis Pena in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1634 vs 1635), separated by just 1 points.

Luis Pena finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Mandel Nallo 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.