Combat Edge Intelligence

Malik Basahel vs Ulysses Gomez

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

3-0-0Record9-5-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
5'5"Height5'5"
67"ReachTBD
125 lbsWeight125 lbs
Asylum Vale TudoTeamMarc Laimon's Cobra Kai

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Malik BasahelNow 1578
If they win+24→ 1602
If they lose-24→ 1554
Ulysses GomezNow 1577
If they win+16→ 1593
If they lose-16→ 1561

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1494 · 3 fightsPre-fight Elo1544 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
2.72
TBD
Strike accuracy
25%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.57
TBD
Strike defense
69%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
0%
TBD
Takedown defense
0%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Malik BasahelUlysses Gomez
15501600165020122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025

Win method breakdown

2 (67%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
1 (33%)
Submission
7 (78%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (22%)

Combat Edge model read

Malik Basahel70%
Ulysses Gomez 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Malik Basahel a 70% favorite over Ulysses Gomez in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1578 vs 1577), separated by just 1 points.

Malik Basahel enters on a 3-fight win streak.

Ulysses Gomez enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Malik Basahel finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Ulysses Gomez 78%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.