Combat Edge Intelligence

Masanori Kanehara vs Rachid Haz

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Rachid Haz
ma

Rachid Haz

“Haz”

11-4-0BantamweightPFL

1601Solid

Tale of the tape

29-13-5Record11-4-0
FeatherweightDivisionBantamweight
5'8"Height5'7"
40.00Reach-
145 lbsWeight135 lbs
Reversal Gym Tachikawa AlphaTeamPhuket Fight Club

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Masanori KaneharaNow 1600
If they win+16→ 1616
If they lose-16→ 1584
Rachid HazNow 1601
If they win+16→ 1617
If they lose-16→ 1585

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1667 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1528 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.88
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
50%
Strike accuracy
TBD
1.63
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
63%
Strike defense
TBD
1.44
Takedown avg.
TBD
50%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
64%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.86
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Masanori KaneharaRachid Haz
155016002021202220232024

Win method breakdown

11 (38%)
KO/TKO
2 (18%)
10 (34%)
Submission
5 (45%)
8 (28%)
Decision
4 (36%)

Combat Edge model read

Rachid Haz63%
Masanori Kanehara 37%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Rachid Haz a 63% favorite over Masanori Kanehara in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1600 vs 1601), separated by just 1 points.

Masanori Kanehara enters on a 4-fight loss streak.

Masanori Kanehara finishes 72% of wins inside the distance, Rachid Haz 64%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.