Combat Edge Intelligence

Matt Van Buren vs Matthew O'Rourke

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

7-6-0Record0-1-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'5"Height-
TBDReach-
205 lbsWeight205 lbs
Team GutterTeamTeam Ryano Waterford

What's at stake

Matt Van Buren is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +15 while a loss costs more — Matthew O'Rourke carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Matt Van BurenNow 1493
If they win+15→ 1508
If they lose-17→ 1476
Matthew O'RourkeNow 1471
If they win+26→ 1497
If they lose-22→ 1449

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1525 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1503 · 1 fights

Tracked stat edges

7.73
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
46%
Strike accuracy
TBD
6.82
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
49%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
50%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Matt Van BurenMatthew O'Rourke
1500201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (29%)
KO/TKO
0 (0%)
2 (29%)
Submission
0 (0%)
3 (43%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Matthew O'Rourke66%
Matt Van Buren 34%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes Matthew O'Rourke a 66% favorite over Matt Van Buren in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Matt Van Buren's way (47%).

Matt Van Buren holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1493 to 1471, a 22-point edge.

Matt Van Buren enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Matt Van Buren finishes 57% of wins inside the distance.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.