Combat Edge Intelligence

Matthew O'Rourke vs Ron Fields

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Ron Fields
us

Ron Fields

“Killing”

30-33-1Light HeavyweightPMMAC

1489Average

Tale of the tape

0-1-0Record30-33-1
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
-Height6'2"
-ReachTBD
205 lbsWeight200 lbs
Team Ryano WaterfordTeamKilling Fields Fighting

What's at stake

Ron Fields is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +11 while a loss costs more — Matthew O'Rourke carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Matthew O'RourkeNow 1471
If they win+25→ 1496
If they lose-23→ 1448
Ron FieldsNow 1489
If they win+11→ 1500
If they lose-13→ 1476

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1503 · 1 fightsPre-fight Elo1495 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Matthew O'RourkeRon Fields
1500201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

0 (0%)
KO/TKO
10 (33%)
0 (0%)
Submission
15 (50%)
0 (0%)
Decision
5 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Matthew O'Rourke66%
Ron Fields 34%Elo baseline: 47%

The Combat Edge model makes Matthew O'Rourke a 66% favorite over Ron Fields in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Ron Fields's way (47%).

Ron Fields holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1489 to 1471, a 18-point edge.

Ron Fields 83%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.