Combat Edge Intelligence

Navajo Stirling vs Quinton Jackson

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

10-0-0Record38-14-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'4"Height6'1"
79"Reach73"
205 lbsWeight265 lbs
City KickboxingTeamWolfslair Academy

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Navajo StirlingNow 1734
If they win+16→ 1750
If they lose-16→ 1718
Quinton JacksonNow 1731
If they win+12→ 1743
If they lose-12→ 1719

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1560 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1685 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

6.24
Sig. strikes / min
3.25
54%
Strike accuracy
54%
2.62
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
2.51
58%
Strike defense
55%
0.86
Takedown avg.
1.52
0%
Takedown accuracy
56%
71%
Takedown defense
74%
0
Submission avg.
0.13

Trajectory

Navajo StirlingQuinton Jackson
15501600165017001750201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (60%)
KO/TKO
20 (53%)
0 (0%)
Submission
4 (11%)
4 (40%)
Decision
14 (37%)

Combat Edge model read

Navajo Stirling76%
Quinton Jackson 24%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Navajo Stirling a 76% favorite over Quinton Jackson in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1734 vs 1731), separated by just 3 points.

Navajo Stirling enters on a 10-fight win streak.

Navajo Stirling finishes 60% of wins inside the distance, Quinton Jackson 63%.

Navajo Stirling carries a 6-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.