Combat Edge Intelligence

Paul Elliott vs Tedd Williams

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

8-2-0Record7-1-0
HeavyweightDivisionHeavyweight
6'1"Height6'0"
-ReachTBD
246 lbsWeight250 lbs
TFT MMATeamWilliams Combat Grappling

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Paul ElliottNow 1607
If they win+24→ 1631
If they lose-24→ 1583
Tedd WilliamsNow 1605
If they win+24→ 1629
If they lose-24→ 1581

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1494 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1531 · 7 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Paul ElliottTedd Williams
1500155016001650200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

8 (100%)
KO/TKO
2 (29%)
0 (0%)
Submission
3 (43%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Paul Elliott70%
Tedd Williams 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Paul Elliott a 70% favorite over Tedd Williams in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1607 vs 1605), separated by just 2 points.

Paul Elliott enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Paul Elliott finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Tedd Williams 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.