Combat Edge Intelligence

Richard Walsh vs Will Davis

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Will Davis
us

Will Davis

“The Famous”

3-2-0WelterweightLFA

1523Average

Tale of the tape

9-5-0Record3-2-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'9"
73,0"Reach-
170 lbsWeight161 lbs
VT1 Martial Arts AcademyTeamDerby City MMA

What's at stake

Will Davis is the Elo favorite, so a win banks only +23 while a loss costs more — Richard Walsh carries the upset premium, with more to gain and less to lose.

Richard WalshNow 1508
If they win+17→ 1525
If they lose-15→ 1493
Will DavisNow 1523
If they win+23→ 1546
If they lose-25→ 1498

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1545 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1528 · 5 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.84
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
47%
Strike accuracy
TBD
2.72
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
59%
Strike defense
TBD
1.55
Takedown avg.
TBD
40%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
67%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.19
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Richard WalshWill Davis
15001550201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (44%)
KO/TKO
1 (33%)
1 (11%)
Submission
1 (33%)
4 (44%)
Decision
1 (33%)

Combat Edge model read

Will Davis66%
Richard Walsh 34%Elo baseline: 52%

The Combat Edge model makes Will Davis a 66% favorite over Richard Walsh in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (52%).

Will Davis holds the higher Combat Edge Elo at 1523 to 1508, a 15-point edge.

Richard Walsh enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Richard Walsh finishes 56% of wins inside the distance, Will Davis 67%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.