Combat Edge Intelligence

Chequina Noso Pedro vs Sheldon Westcott

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

10-5-0Record9-3-1
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
5'10"Height6'1"
72"Reach71,0"
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
BA ArmyTeamComplete Fitness and Martial Arts

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Chequina Noso PedroNow 1578
If they win+16→ 1594
If they lose-16→ 1562
Sheldon WestcottNow 1580
If they win+16→ 1596
If they lose-16→ 1564

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1546 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1563 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
2.26
TBD
Strike accuracy
41%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.73
TBD
Strike defense
37%
TBD
Takedown avg.
3.23
TBD
Takedown accuracy
38%
TBD
Takedown defense
14%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Chequina Noso PedroSheldon Westcott
155016002014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

1 (10%)
KO/TKO
4 (44%)
4 (40%)
Submission
3 (33%)
5 (50%)
Decision
2 (22%)

Combat Edge model read

Chequina Noso Pedro60%
Sheldon Westcott 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Chequina Noso Pedro a 60% favorite over Sheldon Westcott in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Sheldon Westcott's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1578 vs 1580), separated by just 2 points.

Chequina Noso Pedro finishes 50% of wins inside the distance, Sheldon Westcott 78%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.