Combat Edge Intelligence

Daniel Frunza vs Leonardo Damiani

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

9-4-0Record12-7-1
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'1"Height5'10"
73"ReachTBD
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
Black House SantiagoTeamAurora MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Daniel FrunzaNow 1574
If they win+16→ 1590
If they lose-16→ 1558
Leonardo DamianiNow 1578
If they win+16→ 1594
If they lose-16→ 1562

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1522 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1517 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

6.30
Sig. strikes / min
1.67
40%
Strike accuracy
24%
6.67
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
4.17
57%
Strike defense
38%
0
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
60%
Takedown defense
50%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Daniel FrunzaLeonardo Damiani
15501600202320242025

Win method breakdown

8 (89%)
KO/TKO
3 (25%)
0 (0%)
Submission
6 (50%)
1 (11%)
Decision
3 (25%)

Combat Edge model read

Daniel Frunza62%
Leonardo Damiani 38%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Daniel Frunza a 62% favorite over Leonardo Damiani in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Leonardo Damiani's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1574 vs 1578), separated by just 4 points.

Daniel Frunza enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Leonardo Damiani enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Daniel Frunza finishes 89% of wins inside the distance, Leonardo Damiani 75%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.