Combat Edge Intelligence

Jose Johnson vs Peter Danesoe

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Peter Danesoe
th

Peter Danesoe

“The Asian Viking”

6-3-0FlyweightM2MMA

1598Solid

Tale of the tape

16-10-0Record6-3-0
FlyweightDivisionFlyweight
6'0"Height5'9"
71"ReachTBD
125 lbsWeight126 lbs
Twin Wolves MMATeamTeam Quest Thailand

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jose JohnsonNow 1608
If they win+12→ 1620
If they lose-12→ 1596
Peter DanesoeNow 1598
If they win+16→ 1614
If they lose-16→ 1582

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1616 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1541 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.22
Sig. strikes / min
4.98
58%
Strike accuracy
54%
1.64
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
7.02
53%
Strike defense
38%
0.71
Takedown avg.
0
60%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
39%
Takedown defense
63%
0.71
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Jose JohnsonPeter Danesoe
155016001650202320242025

Win method breakdown

8 (50%)
KO/TKO
4 (67%)
3 (19%)
Submission
2 (33%)
5 (31%)
Decision
0 (0%)

Combat Edge model read

Peter Danesoe60%
Jose Johnson 40%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Peter Danesoe a 60% favorite over Jose Johnson in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Jose Johnson's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1608 vs 1598), separated by just 10 points.

Jose Johnson enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Jose Johnson finishes 69% of wins inside the distance, Peter Danesoe 100%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.