Combat Edge Intelligence

Janaina Silva vs Namiko Kawabata

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Janaina Silva
br

Janaina Silva

“Jana Popozinha”

5-1-0StrawweightDWCS

1561Solid

Tale of the tape

5-1-0Record7-5-0
StrawweightDivisionStrawweight
5'1"Height5'3"
TBDReachTBD
115 lbsWeight108 lbs
Babuino Gold TeamTeamMouri Dojo

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Janaina SilvaNow 1561
If they win+24→ 1585
If they lose-24→ 1537
Namiko KawabataNow 1557
If they win+16→ 1573
If they lose-16→ 1541

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1540 · 7 fightsPre-fight Elo1554 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
0%
Strike accuracy
TBD
1.50
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
63%
Strike defense
TBD
0
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
0%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Janaina SilvaNamiko Kawabata
150015501600202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (40%)
KO/TKO
1 (14%)
0 (0%)
Submission
1 (14%)
3 (60%)
Decision
5 (71%)

Combat Edge model read

Namiko Kawabata60%
Janaina Silva 40%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Namiko Kawabata a 60% favorite over Janaina Silva in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Janaina Silva's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1561 vs 1557), separated by just 4 points.

Janaina Silva enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Janaina Silva finishes 40% of wins inside the distance, Namiko Kawabata 29%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.