Combat Edge Intelligence

Biaggio Ali Walsh vs Brandon Jenkins

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Brandon Jenkins
us

Brandon Jenkins

“The Human Highlight Reel”

18-12-0WelterweightKC

1554Solid

Tale of the tape

4-2-0Record18-12-0
LightweightDivisionWelterweight
5'10"Height6'0"
72"Reach71"
155 lbsWeight170 lbs
Xtreme Couture MMATeamSyndicate MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Biaggio Ali WalshNow 1544
If they win+25→ 1569
If they lose-23→ 1521
Brandon JenkinsNow 1554
If they win+16→ 1570
If they lose-16→ 1538

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1516 · 6 fightsPre-fight Elo1562 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
2.93
TBD
Strike accuracy
41%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
8.05
TBD
Strike defense
33%
TBD
Takedown avg.
0
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
27%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Biaggio Ali WalshBrandon Jenkins
1500155020252026

Win method breakdown

3 (75%)
KO/TKO
12 (67%)
0 (0%)
Submission
3 (17%)
1 (25%)
Decision
3 (17%)

Combat Edge model read

Biaggio Ali Walsh63%
Brandon Jenkins 37%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Biaggio Ali Walsh a 63% favorite over Brandon Jenkins in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Brandon Jenkins's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1544 vs 1554), separated by just 10 points.

Biaggio Ali Walsh finishes 75% of wins inside the distance, Brandon Jenkins 83%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.