Combat Edge Intelligence

Damian Janikowski vs Eric Lawson

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

11-9-0Record9-5-0
MiddleweightDivisionMiddleweight
5'11"Height6'0"
70"ReachTBD
185 lbsWeight180 lbs
NemesisTeamCombat Fitness

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Damian JanikowskiNow 1521
If they win+16→ 1537
If they lose-16→ 1505
Eric LawsonNow 1525
If they win+16→ 1541
If they lose-16→ 1509

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1537 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1512 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Damian JanikowskiEric Lawson
150015501600200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

5 (45%)
KO/TKO
2 (22%)
2 (18%)
Submission
5 (56%)
4 (36%)
Decision
2 (22%)

Combat Edge model read

Damian Janikowski66%
Eric Lawson 34%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Damian Janikowski a 66% favorite over Eric Lawson in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Eric Lawson's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1521 vs 1525), separated by just 4 points.

Eric Lawson enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Damian Janikowski finishes 64% of wins inside the distance, Eric Lawson 78%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.