Combat Edge Intelligence

Dan Argueta vs Scott Jorgensen

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Dan Argueta
us

Dan Argueta

“The Determined”

9-3-0BantamweightUFC

1629Solid

Tale of the tape

9-3-0Record15-12-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'7"Height5'5"
68"Reach37.00
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Jackson-Wink MMATeamTwisted Genetiks

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Dan ArguetaNow 1629
If they win+16→ 1645
If they lose-16→ 1613
Scott JorgensenNow 1628
If they win+16→ 1644
If they lose-16→ 1612

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1606 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1642 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.48
Sig. strikes / min
3.37
43%
Strike accuracy
40%
3.44
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.41
51%
Strike defense
65%
4.36
Takedown avg.
2.61
36%
Takedown accuracy
46%
56%
Takedown defense
60%
1.45
Submission avg.
0.73

Trajectory

Dan ArguetaScott Jorgensen
16001650201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

Win method breakdown

2 (22%)
KO/TKO
2 (13%)
4 (44%)
Submission
5 (33%)
3 (33%)
Decision
8 (53%)

Combat Edge model read

Dan Argueta60%
Scott Jorgensen 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Dan Argueta a 60% favorite over Scott Jorgensen in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1629 vs 1628), separated by just 1 points.

Dan Argueta enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Dan Argueta finishes 67% of wins inside the distance, Scott Jorgensen 47%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.