Combat Edge Intelligence

Jonathan Martin vs Tim Wilde

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Tim Wilde
gb-eng

Tim Wilde

“The Experiment”

17-7-1LightweightCage Warriors

1605Solid

Tale of the tape

8-3-0Record17-7-1
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'11"Height5'11"
71.5"Reach75"
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Carolina Combat Sports and FitnessTeamRenegade MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Jonathan MartinNow 1606
If they win+16→ 1622
If they lose-16→ 1590
Tim WildeNow 1605
If they win+16→ 1621
If they lose-16→ 1589

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1499 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1581 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Jonathan MartinTim Wilde
15501600165020242025

Win method breakdown

2 (25%)
KO/TKO
7 (41%)
5 (63%)
Submission
1 (6%)
1 (13%)
Decision
9 (53%)

Combat Edge model read

Jonathan Martin60%
Tim Wilde 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Jonathan Martin a 60% favorite over Tim Wilde in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1606 vs 1605), separated by just 1 points.

Jonathan Martin finishes 88% of wins inside the distance, Tim Wilde 47%.

Tim Wilde carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.