Combat Edge Intelligence

Leonardo Silva vs Ruslan Nazhmudinov

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

22-10-0Record10-2-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'2"Height6'2"
75"Reach-
206 lbsWeight205 lbs
China TeamTeamSpitfire Gym Berlin

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Leonardo SilvaNow 1607
If they win+12→ 1619
If they lose-12→ 1595
Ruslan NazhmudinovNow 1601
If they win+16→ 1617
If they lose-16→ 1585

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1563 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1507 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.07
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
40%
Strike accuracy
TBD
0.54
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
50%
Strike defense
TBD
24.11
Takedown avg.
TBD
50%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
0%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Leonardo SilvaRuslan Nazhmudinov
16001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

12 (55%)
KO/TKO
4 (44%)
4 (18%)
Submission
1 (11%)
6 (27%)
Decision
4 (44%)

Combat Edge model read

Ruslan Nazhmudinov73%
Leonardo Silva 27%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Ruslan Nazhmudinov a 73% favorite over Leonardo Silva in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Leonardo Silva's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1607 vs 1601), separated by just 6 points.

Leonardo Silva enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Leonardo Silva finishes 73% of wins inside the distance, Ruslan Nazhmudinov 56%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.