Combat Edge Intelligence

Mike de la Torre vs Nashkho Galaev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

14-9-0Record13-10-0
LightweightDivisionFeatherweight
6'0"Height5'8"
71,0"Reach69"
155 lbsWeight146 lbs
Inv1ktus MMATeamFight Club Berkut

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Mike de la TorreNow 1570
If they win+16→ 1586
If they lose-16→ 1554
Nashkho GalaevNow 1571
If they win+16→ 1587
If they lose-16→ 1555

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1607 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1526 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.21
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
39%
Strike accuracy
TBD
4.75
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
52%
Strike defense
TBD
0.36
Takedown avg.
TBD
17%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
83%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Mike de la TorreNashkho Galaev
15501600165020162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (50%)
KO/TKO
10 (77%)
5 (36%)
Submission
0 (0%)
2 (14%)
Decision
3 (23%)

Combat Edge model read

Nashkho Galaev70%
Mike de la Torre 30%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Nashkho Galaev a 70% favorite over Mike de la Torre in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1570 vs 1571), separated by just 1 points.

Mike de la Torre enters on a 5-fight loss streak.

Mike de la Torre finishes 86% of wins inside the distance, Nashkho Galaev 77%.

Mike de la Torre carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.