Combat Edge Intelligence

Miles Johns vs Raul Ramses

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Raul Ramses
pe

Raul Ramses

“El Faraon”

13-0-0BantamweightBFL

1720Good

Tale of the tape

16-5-0Record13-0-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'7"Height5'10"
66"Reach-
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Marathon MMA· 1669 avg Elo · 3 ratedTeamPitbull Martial Arts Center· 1693 avg Elo · 6 rated

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Miles JohnsNow 1718
If they win+16→ 1734
If they lose-16→ 1702
Raul RamsesNow 1720
If they win+16→ 1736
If they lose-16→ 1704

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1679 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1497 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.36
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
45%
Strike accuracy
TBD
2.99
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
66%
Strike defense
TBD
1.22
Takedown avg.
TBD
2%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
78%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Miles JohnsRaul Ramses
17001750202420252026

Win method breakdown

5 (31%)
KO/TKO
5 (38%)
2 (13%)
Submission
3 (23%)
9 (56%)
Decision
5 (38%)

Combat Edge model read

Raul Ramses57%
Miles Johns 43%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Raul Ramses a 57% favorite over Miles Johns in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1718 vs 1720), separated by just 2 points.

Raul Ramses enters on a 10-fight win streak.

Miles Johns finishes 44% of wins inside the distance, Raul Ramses 62%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.