Neiman Gracie vs Tim Means
Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.
Compare any two fighters →
Tale of the tape
13-5-0Record33-17-1
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height6'2"
73.5"Reach75"
170 lbsWeight170 lbs
What's at stake
The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.
If they win+16→ 1661
If they lose-16→ 1629
If they win+12→ 1657
If they lose-12→ 1633
Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.
Opponent quality
Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.
1655 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1669 · 10 fights
Tracked stat edges
Tracked UFC statistics may not cover a fighter's full career. Unavailable measurements are not zero.
Elo Trajectory
Neiman GracieTim Means
Win method breakdown
Combat Edge model read
Neiman Gracie52%
Tim Means 48%Elo baseline: 50%
The Combat Edge model makes Neiman Gracie a 52% favorite over Tim Means in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).
Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1645 vs 1645), separated by just 0 points.
Tim Means enters on a 2-fight loss streak.
Neiman Gracie finishes 77% of wins inside the distance, Tim Means 76%.
Tim Means carries a 2-inch reach advantage.
Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.