Combat Edge Intelligence

Paulo Victor vs Timmy Cuamba

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Paulo Victor
br

Paulo Victor

“Zero 3 / Menor CZS”

10-2-0BantamweightUAEW

1651Good
Timmy Cuamba
us

Timmy Cuamba

“Twilight Timmy”

10-4-0FeatherweightUFC

1649Solid

Tale of the tape

10-2-0Record10-4-0
BantamweightDivisionFeatherweight
5'2"Height5'8"
-Reach71"
129 lbsWeight145 lbs
Nauas CombatTeamXtreme Couture

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Paulo VictorNow 1651
If they win+16→ 1667
If they lose-16→ 1635
Timmy CuambaNow 1649
If they win+16→ 1665
If they lose-16→ 1633

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1507 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1591 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
2.77
TBD
Strike accuracy
44%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.58
TBD
Strike defense
58%
TBD
Takedown avg.
1.31
TBD
Takedown accuracy
32%
TBD
Takedown defense
72%
TBD
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Paulo VictorTimmy Cuamba
16001650202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (40%)
KO/TKO
5 (50%)
4 (40%)
Submission
0 (0%)
2 (20%)
Decision
5 (50%)

Combat Edge model read

Paulo Victor55%
Timmy Cuamba 45%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Paulo Victor a 55% favorite over Timmy Cuamba in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1651 vs 1649), separated by just 2 points.

Paulo Victor finishes 80% of wins inside the distance, Timmy Cuamba 50%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.