Combat Edge Intelligence

Abubakar Vagaev vs Joaquin Buckley

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

25-4-0Record21-8-0
WelterweightDivisionWelterweight
6'0"Height5'8"
-Reach76"
171 lbsWeight170 lbs
Fight Club Akhmat· 1683 avg Elo · 20 ratedTeamMurcielago MMA· 1703 avg Elo · 4 rated

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Abubakar VagaevNow 1760
If they win+12→ 1772
If they lose-12→ 1748
Joaquin BuckleyNow 1755
If they win+12→ 1767
If they lose-12→ 1743

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1639 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1737 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

0
Sig. strikes / min
3.62
TBD
Strike accuracy
36%
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.10
TBD
Strike defense
59%
TBD
Takedown avg.
1.43
TBD
Takedown accuracy
17%
TBD
Takedown defense
70%
TBD
Submission avg.
0.08

Trajectory

Abubakar VagaevJoaquin Buckley
17001750202420252026

Win method breakdown

4 (16%)
KO/TKO
15 (71%)
1 (4%)
Submission
0 (0%)
20 (80%)
Decision
6 (29%)

Combat Edge model read

Abubakar Vagaev53%
Joaquin Buckley 47%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Abubakar Vagaev a 53% favorite over Joaquin Buckley in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1760 vs 1755), separated by just 5 points.

Abubakar Vagaev enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Joaquin Buckley enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Abubakar Vagaev finishes 20% of wins inside the distance, Joaquin Buckley 71%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.