Combat Edge Intelligence

Acacio dos Santos vs Leonardo Silva

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

15-6-0Record22-10-0
Light HeavyweightDivisionLight Heavyweight
6'4"Height6'2"
45,0"Reach75"
205 lbsWeight206 lbs
Guarulhos Fight TeamTeamChina Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Acacio dos SantosNow 1621
If they win+16→ 1637
If they lose-16→ 1605
Leonardo SilvaNow 1616
If they win+12→ 1628
If they lose-12→ 1604

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1561 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1581 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

1.27
Sig. strikes / min
1.07
41%
Strike accuracy
40%
1.40
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
0.54
43%
Strike defense
50%
0
Takedown avg.
24.11
TBD
Takedown accuracy
50%
31%
Takedown defense
0%
0
Submission avg.
0

Trajectory

Acacio dos SantosLeonardo Silva
16001650202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (47%)
KO/TKO
12 (55%)
0 (0%)
Submission
4 (18%)
8 (53%)
Decision
6 (27%)

Combat Edge model read

Leonardo Silva60%
Acacio dos Santos 40%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Leonardo Silva a 60% favorite over Acacio dos Santos in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Acacio dos Santos's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1621 vs 1616), separated by just 5 points.

Leonardo Silva enters on a 3-fight loss streak.

Acacio dos Santos finishes 47% of wins inside the distance, Leonardo Silva 73%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.