Combat Edge Intelligence

Ahmad Halimson vs Ryan Healy

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Ryan Healy
us

Ryan Healy

“Diamond”

25-14-1LightweightMFC

1576Solid

Tale of the tape

8-4-1Record25-14-1
LightweightDivisionLightweight
5'10"Height6'1"
-ReachTBD
155 lbsWeight155 lbs
Spitfire Gym BerlinTeamSports Lab

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Ahmad HalimsonNow 1580
If they win+16→ 1596
If they lose-16→ 1564
Ryan HealyNow 1576
If they win+12→ 1588
If they lose-12→ 1564

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1509 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1546 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

TBD
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
TBD
Strike accuracy
TBD
TBD
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
TBD
Strike defense
TBD
TBD
Takedown avg.
TBD
TBD
Takedown accuracy
TBD
TBD
Takedown defense
TBD
TBD
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Ahmad HalimsonRyan Healy
15501600201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

2 (25%)
KO/TKO
13 (52%)
4 (50%)
Submission
6 (24%)
2 (25%)
Decision
6 (24%)

Combat Edge model read

Ahmad Halimson64%
Ryan Healy 36%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Ahmad Halimson a 64% favorite over Ryan Healy in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1580 vs 1576), separated by just 4 points.

Ahmad Halimson enters on a 2-fight win streak.

Ahmad Halimson finishes 75% of wins inside the distance, Ryan Healy 76%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.