Combat Edge Intelligence

Aiemann Zahabi vs Mitchell McKee

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

14-3-0Record11-0-0
BantamweightDivisionBantamweight
5'8"Height5'7"
68"Reach66"
135 lbsWeight135 lbs
Tristar GymTeamKill Cliff FC

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Aiemann ZahabiNow 1724
If they win+16→ 1740
If they lose-16→ 1708
Mitchell McKeeNow 1721
If they win+16→ 1737
If they lose-16→ 1705

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1695 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1535 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

4.54
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
48%
Strike accuracy
TBD
4.08
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
69%
Strike defense
TBD
0.12
Takedown avg.
TBD
14%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
84%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Aiemann ZahabiMitchell McKee
1600165017001750202420252026

Win method breakdown

6 (43%)
KO/TKO
6 (55%)
2 (14%)
Submission
0 (0%)
6 (43%)
Decision
5 (45%)

Combat Edge model read

Mitchell McKee53%
Aiemann Zahabi 47%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Mitchell McKee a 53% favorite over Aiemann Zahabi in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Aiemann Zahabi's way (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1724 vs 1721), separated by just 3 points.

Mitchell McKee enters on a 10-fight win streak.

Aiemann Zahabi finishes 57% of wins inside the distance, Mitchell McKee 55%.

Aiemann Zahabi carries a 2-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.