Combat Edge Intelligence

Anshul Jubli vs Levan Khabalaev

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Anshul Jubli
in

Anshul Jubli

“King of Lions”

7-2-0LightweightUFC

1597Solid

Tale of the tape

7-2-0Record5-0-0
LightweightDivisionLightweight
6'0"Height6'2"
69"Reach-
156 lbsWeight155 lbs
Tiger Muay ThaiTeamLongo's MMA

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Anshul JubliNow 1597
If they win+24→ 1621
If they lose-24→ 1573
Levan KhabalaevNow 1598
If they win+24→ 1622
If they lose-24→ 1574

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1545 · 9 fightsPre-fight Elo1500 · 4 fights

Tracked stat edges

6.48
Sig. strikes / min
TBD
46%
Strike accuracy
TBD
5.61
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
51%
Strike defense
TBD
0.82
Takedown avg.
TBD
18%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
64%
Takedown defense
TBD
0.41
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Anshul JubliLevan Khabalaev
16001650202320242025

Win method breakdown

2 (29%)
KO/TKO
3 (60%)
1 (14%)
Submission
1 (20%)
4 (57%)
Decision
1 (20%)

Combat Edge model read

Levan Khabalaev60%
Anshul Jubli 40%Elo baseline: 50%

The Combat Edge model makes Levan Khabalaev a 60% favorite over Anshul Jubli in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (50%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1597 vs 1598), separated by just 1 points.

Anshul Jubli enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Levan Khabalaev enters on a 4-fight win streak.

Anshul Jubli finishes 43% of wins inside the distance, Levan Khabalaev 80%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.