Combat Edge Intelligence

Anthony Ivy vs Farman Hasanov

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →
Anthony Ivy
us

Anthony Ivy

“Aquaman”

15-8-0MiddleweightPFL

1636Solid

Tale of the tape

15-8-0Record6-0-0
MiddleweightDivisionWelterweight
6'2"Height6'0"
74"Reach74"
176 lbsWeight171 lbs
W4R Training Center· 1622 avg Elo · 4 ratedTeamRenzo Gracie Academy

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Anthony IvyNow 1636
If they win+16→ 1652
If they lose-16→ 1620
Farman HasanovNow 1640
If they win+24→ 1664
If they lose-24→ 1616

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1534 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1514 · 6 fights

Tracked stat edges

2.50
Sig. strikes / min
0
42%
Strike accuracy
TBD
4.57
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
TBD
51%
Strike defense
TBD
4.69
Takedown avg.
TBD
21%
Takedown accuracy
TBD
100%
Takedown defense
TBD
0
Submission avg.
TBD

Trajectory

Anthony IvyFarman Hasanov
1550160016502023202420252026

Win method breakdown

7 (47%)
KO/TKO
4 (67%)
8 (53%)
Submission
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Decision
2 (33%)

Combat Edge model read

Farman Hasanov66%
Anthony Ivy 34%Elo baseline: 51%

The Combat Edge model makes Farman Hasanov a 66% favorite over Anthony Ivy in a hypothetical meeting — in line with the Elo baseline (51%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1636 vs 1640), separated by just 4 points.

Farman Hasanov enters on a 6-fight win streak.

Anthony Ivy finishes 100% of wins inside the distance, Farman Hasanov 67%.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.