Combat Edge Intelligence

Anthony Pettis vs Nate Diaz

Side-by-side comparison: records, physical profile, Combat Edge Elo, win methods, tracked UFC stats, and common opponents.

Compare any two fighters →

Tale of the tape

25-14-0Record21-14-0
LightweightDivisionWelterweight
5'10"Height6'0"
72,5"Reach76"
155 lbsWeight170 lbs
RoufusportTeamCesar Gracie Fight Team

What's at stake

The ratings are close, so the Elo swings are near-symmetric — the winner and loser trade a similar number of points either way.

Anthony PettisNow 1680
If they win+12→ 1692
If they lose-12→ 1668
Nate DiazNow 1674
If they win+12→ 1686
If they lose-12→ 1662

Projected for a decision result at current ratings. A finish (KO/TKO or submission) scales the swing up by roughly 20–25%.

Opponent quality

Average pre-fight Elo of each fighter's latest 10 counted pro MMA opponents. Higher means the recent schedule was stronger; later opponent results do not rewrite the score.

1653 · 10 fightsPre-fight Elo1728 · 10 fights

Tracked stat edges

3.05
Sig. strikes / min
4.57
48%
Strike accuracy
45%
3.44
Strikes absorbed / minLower is better
3.77
54%
Strike defense
53%
0.61
Takedown avg.
1.05
50%
Takedown accuracy
31%
60%
Takedown defense
42%
1.06
Submission avg.
1.29

Trajectory

Anthony PettisNate Diaz
170017502020202120222023202420252026

Win method breakdown

11 (44%)
KO/TKO
5 (24%)
8 (32%)
Submission
12 (57%)
6 (24%)
Decision
4 (19%)

Combat Edge model read

Nate Diaz60%
Anthony Pettis 40%Elo baseline: 49%

The Combat Edge model makes Nate Diaz a 60% favorite over Anthony Pettis in a hypothetical meeting — an upset call against the Elo baseline, which leans Anthony Pettis's way (49%).

Their Combat Edge Elo ratings are nearly level (1680 vs 1674), separated by just 6 points.

Anthony Pettis enters on a 2-fight loss streak.

Anthony Pettis finishes 76% of wins inside the distance, Nate Diaz 81%.

Nate Diaz carries a 4-inch reach advantage.

Model estimate for a hypothetical bout, generated from Combat Edge Elo, form, and career stats. Not a betting recommendation.